Formal caregivers' perceptions and experiences of using pet robots for persons living with dementia in long
Review
doi: 10.1111/jan.14581. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
Affiliations
PMID: 33016382 DOI: 10.1111/jan.14581Review
Formal caregivers' perceptions and experiences of using pet robots for persons living with dementia in long-term care: A meta-ethnography
Anthony Scerri et al. J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jan.
Abstract
in English, Chinese
Aim: To explore the formal caregivers' perceptions and experiences of using pet robots for persons living with dementia residing in long-term care settings and the factors influencing their perceptions by evaluating, integrating, and synthesizing findings from relevant international research articles using a meta-ethnography.
Design: Noblit and Hare's interpretative meta-ethnography.
Data sources: Eight articles, published between 2013-2018, were identified following a systematic search of four databases (Scopus, ProQuest Central, EBSCO, and Google Scholar) between June 2019-February 2020.
Review methods: Two researchers independently appraised the selected articles. Noblit and Hare's seven steps and a meta-ethnography reporting guidance were used. Reciprocal translation was used to obtain a line of argument synthesis.
Results: Three overarching themes were identified: a beneficial tool but not for everybody, a tool that has limitations but could be overcome, and a positive experience if appropriately introduced and sustained.
Conclusion: This meta-ethnography contributes to the understanding of current potential benefits and limitations of pet robots for persons living with dementia residing in long-term settings. It also identifies several factors, as perceived by caregivers, that may influence their acceptability, adoption, and routine use in practice.
Impact: Although for the past two decades pet robots have been used as a psychosocial intervention for persons living with dementia in long-term care settings, there is a dearth of literature on the perception of formal caregivers and their experience of such interventions. While pet robots can have emotional, social, behavioural, and practical benefits, there are several technological, organizational, and contextual challenges and limitations that constrain their routine use. The solutions synthesized in this review can be of benefit to robot designers, facility managers, policy makers, and other health care professionals interested in introducing pet robots in long-term care settings.
目标: 通过使用Meta-民族志评估、整合和综合相关国际研究文章的研究发现,探讨正式护理人员对长期照护中的痴呆患者使用宠物机器人的认知度和体验,以及影响其认知度的各类因素。 设计: 诺布里特和黑尔两位学者提出的解释性Meta-民族志。 数据来源: 在2019年6月至2020年2月对四个数据库(Scopus电子数据库、ProQuest中央数据库、史蒂芬斯数据库(EBSCO)和谷歌学术搜索(Google Scholar))进行系统搜索后,确定了8篇2013年至2018年发表的论文。 评价方法: 两名研究员独立评价甄选出的文章。然后采用诺布里特和黑尔两位学者提出的七步法和Meta-民族志报告指南。运用相互转换得到一连串综合性观点。 结果: 确定了三个重要主题:一种有利的手段,但并非人人适用;一种有局限性的手段,但这种局限性可以克服;以及一种若经适当引进和维持的积极经验。 结论: 这种Meta-民族志方法有助于了解宠物机器人对长期照护中的痴呆患者的潜在优势和局限性。此外,还确定了若干在护理人员看来可能会影响他们接受度、采用率和在日常工作中使用的因素。 影响: 尽管在过去的二十年里,宠物机器人已被用作长期护理的痴呆症患者的心理社会干预措施,但有关于正式护理人员对此类干预措施的认知和经验方面的文献仍存在缺少。虽然宠物机器人具备情感、社会、行为和实用性方面的优势,但在日常使用过程中仍存在一些技术、组织和环境方面的挑战和限制。本篇评价文章综合分析得出的解决方案对机器人设计师、设施管理人员、政策制定者和其他有意向将宠物机器人引入长期护理环境的医疗保健专业人员带来益处。.
Keywords: dementia; experience; formal caregivers; long-term care; meta-ethnography; perceptions; pet robots; psychosocial intervention.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PubMed Disclaimer
Similar articles
Caregivers' perceptions of aggressive behaviour in nursing home residents living with dementia: A meta-ethnography.
Nybakken S, Strandås M, Bondas T. Nybakken S, et al. J Adv Nurs. 2018 Dec;74(12):2713-2726. doi: 10.1111/jan.13807. Epub 2018 Aug 22. J Adv Nurs. 2018. PMID: 30019403
A qualitative systematic review of family caregivers' experiences of artificial nutrition and hydration at home: A meta-ethnography.
Lisiecka D, Kearns Á, Bonass A. Lisiecka D, et al. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jul;57(4):717-736. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12726. Epub 2022 Apr 19. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022. PMID: 35439344 Free PMC article. Review.
Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in evidence synthesis: how the PatMed study approached embedding audience responses into the expression of a meta-ethnography.
Park S, Khan N, Stevenson F, Malpass A. Park S, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0918-2. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020. PMID: 32041523 Free PMC article.
Strategies to Implement Pet Robots in Long-Term Care Facilities for Dementia Care: A Modified Delphi Study.
Koh WQ, Hoel V, Casey D, Toomey E. Koh WQ, et al. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Jan;24(1):90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Nov 1. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023. PMID: 36332687
Changing dynamics of caregiving: a meta-ethnography study of informal caregivers' experiences with older immigrant family members in Europe.
Shrestha S, Arora S, Hunter A, Debesay J. Shrestha S, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 17;23(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09023-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 36650497 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
Impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia: a scoping review.
Schneider C, Nißen M, Kowatsch T, Vinay R. Schneider C, et al. BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 10;14(2):e080545. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080545. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38341210 Free PMC article. Review.
Strategies for implementing pet robots in care homes and nursing homes for residents with dementia: protocol for a modified Delphi study.
Koh WQ, Casey D, Hoel V, Toomey E. Koh WQ, et al. Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jun 3;3(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00308-z. Implement Sci Commun. 2022. PMID: 35659111 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES Abbott, R., Orr, N., McGill, P., Whear, R., Bethel, A., Garside, R., Stein, K., & Thompson-Coon, J. O. (2019). How do “robopets” impact the health and well-being of residents in care homes? A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 14(3), e12239. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12239 Atkins, S., Lewin, S., Smith, H., Engel, M., Fretheim, A., & Volmink, J. (2008). Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21 Banerjee, S. (2009). The use of antipsychotic medication for people with dementia: time for action. Department of Health (United Kingdom). Accessed from http://psychrights.org/research/digest/nlps/banerjeereportongeriatricneu... Birks, M., Bodak, M., Barlas, J., Harwood, J., & Pether, M. (2016). Robotic seals as therapeutic tools in an aged care facility: A qualitative study. Journal of Aging Research, 2016, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8569602 Chang, W. L., & Sabanovic, S. (2015). Interaction expands function: Social shaping of the therapeutic robot PARO in a nursing home. In 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 343-350).Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE).Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Ovid Technologies, Inc. WileyMedical
MedlinePlus Health InformationMiscellaneous
NCI CPTAC Assay Portal相关知识
富有情感的机器宠物
在阿富汗，把鸟当做宠物来养已有好长的历史了 的翻译是： In Afghanistan, to raise the bird as a pet has a long history 中文翻译英文意思，翻译英语
宠物机器人在老年痴呆患者照护中的应用进展
上海养宠市场增长
奇异动物成澳大利亚民众新萌宠
奇异动物成澳洲民众新宠
智能毛皮，让宠物机器人更懂主人的情绪
2590亿美元的大市场：谁取悦宠物，谁就是大赢家
3m 6m 10m 15m 20m Bird Pet Flying Rope Training Rope Parrot Cockatiels Starling Leash Rope - Buy Leash Rope
rope Leash
bird Leash Product on Alibaba.com
I think the most important thing is keep pets in pet at the same time, the prevention and control must be good pets diseases 的翻译是：我认为最重要的事情是在同一时间、 预防和控制的宠物让宠物必须是好的宠物疾病 中文翻译英文意思，翻译英语
网址: Formal caregivers' perceptions and experiences of using pet robots for persons living with dementia in long https://m.mcbbbk.com/newsview385528.html
| 上一篇: 魔兽世界：强制保留一点血 宠物对 |
下一篇: 南通市长期照护保险失能等级公示书 |
